![enginehistory.org Forum Index](templates/subSilver/images/logo_phpBB.gif) |
enginehistory.org Aircraft Engine Historical Society Members' Bulletin Board
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jjuutinen
Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 180
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2005 04:13 Post subject: cowl flap design and spinners |
|
|
I have often wondered why did American designers stick so long with the circumferential type outward opening cowl flaps despite their serious disadvantages? E.g. it is mentioned in a Liberator pilot manual that lesser penalty in range is obtained by cruising in auto rich than by opening the cowl flaps fully. I´d call this a bad design. Sliding type gills would have had several advantages such lesser drag, no impact on visibility over the nose and lesser trim changes and the technology was there. E.g. when the Finnish Myrsky was being developed it was found that replacing the older style cowl flaps with sliding gills drag was reduced considerably.
Another point is spinners. How come that basically every other aircraft building nation found spinners essential for good radial installation, yet US designers stuck to spinnerless designs? I have heard someone reasoning that "spinners add complication". Oh yea, a spinner would absolutely ruin the maintainability of such simple aircraft like the Corsair. Indeed. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
szielinski
![](images/avatars/693106421439e2494bbff5.jpg)
Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 94 Location: Canberra, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 00:58 Post subject: |
|
|
Given the propensity of some manufacturers (eg Wright) to ignore NACA white papers on the subject, it doesn't surprise me.
It does seem unlikely that there is a valid technical reason for sticking with that drag-hungry arrangement. I haven't heard of the prop mechanism requiring prop-blast levels of air to cool it or anything.
In development, the triumvirate of money, politics and technology always puts technology last. Technology only succeeds where it is deemed appropriate by the other two factors.
In hindsight, the US probably realised they could win the war with the types in service and stuck with them - just give 'em a few points for style, they are distinctive, if nothing else. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
jjuutinen
Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 180
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 04:33 Post subject: |
|
|
It seems that the opposite is true, i.e. the spinner helps to prevent oil congealing (if oil operated CSU) in the prop hub in cold weather. Never heard of prop hub overheating. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|